Science, technologies, innovations (STI) № 2(2) 2017, 16-28 p

PDF

Huseinova A.D. — Doctor of Science in Economics, Azerbaijan State Economic University, Department of Information Economy and Technology, Azerbaijan, Baku, 135, Aliyeva Str., AZ1073; +(994) 55-785-35-36;
eim09@rambler.ru

Shukurova A.S. — PhD in Economics, ASEU, Department of Business Management, Azerbaijan, Baku, 135, Aliyeva Str., AZ1073; +(994) 55-577-61-09; doqru@yandex.ru

Huseinli A.T. — PhD in Economics, ASEU, Department of Business Management, Azerbaijan, Baku, 135, Aliyeva Str., AZ1073; +(994) 51-599-81-18; ayten.huseynli@mail.ru

BASIC S AND ANALYSIS OF INNOVATIVE POTENTIAL

Abstract. Prospects of the future socio-economic development of the Azerbaijan Republic directly the organization of innovative activity in the country and improving the efficiency of management depend on the solution of problems. In accordance with it, recently for making analysis focused on innovation potential in our republic and to identify factors that impede to technical and technological development, a comprehensive study of foreign experience is directed to the increasing efficiency of the national innovation system (NIS) of our country. The aim of the article are intensive development of innovation-oriented economy in Azerbaijan, increasing its competitiveness and ensuring to strengthen the position of country in the international arena the essence of the innovation potential in the innovation process, determination of the content and the formation of the modern trends, development of effective methods and mechanisms of management system of innovation process.

Keywords: innovation potential, national innovation system, innovation activity, innovation, indicator system.

REFERENCES
1. Guseynova A.D. (2013) Obshchaya struktura innovatsionnogo potentsiala [General structure of innovative potential]. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Shikhobalovskiye chteniya: Opyt, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya potrebitel’skogo rynka”, 4–5 iyunya 2013. V2-kh ch. CH. 1.
Samara: Samar. in-t (filial) REU [Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference “Shihobalov Readings: Experience, Challenges and Prospects of Consumer Market Development”], June 4–5, 2013. In 2 hours. Part 1. Samara: Samar. In-t of the RGU], pp. 16–33.
2. Guseynova A.D. (2009) Rol nauki v natsionalnoy innovatsionnoy sisteme [The Role of Science in the National Innovation System]. Novosti nauki i tekhnologiy [Journal of Science and Technology News], no. 1, pp. 40–45.
3. Kokurin D.I. (2001) Innovatsionnaya deyate’nost. [Innovative activity]. Moscow (in Russian): Examen, pp. 576.
4. Nadzhafov Z.M. (2008) Gosudarstvennaya innovatsionnaya politika Azerbaydzhana [State Innovation Policy of Azerbaijan]: Materiali VI Mzhdunarodnoy naukovo-praktichnoy konferentsii. V 2-kh ch. CH. 2. [Materials of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference. In 2 hours Part 2].
Kyiv: UkrISTEI, pp. 59–63.
5. Zhits G.I. (1999) Innovatsionnyy potentsial [Innovation potential]. Saratov (in Russian): SSTU, pp. 131.
6. Garmashova E.P. (2011) Razvitiye teorii innovatsionnykh protsessov [The development of the theory of innovative processes]. Molodoy uchenyy [Young Scientist], no. 2, Vol.1, pp. 90–94.
7. Rothwell R. (1994) Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, Vol.11, no. 1, pp. 7–31.
8. Shapira P. US National Innovation System: Science, technology and innovation Policy develop.
9. SIR Reports. Available at: http://www.scimagoir.com.
10. Solow R.M. Growth Theory: An Exposition. 2nd Edition, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2000, 224 p.
11. Twiss B. Managing technological innovation. Pitman, 1992.
12. Wolf M. The Japanese Conspiracy, London, 1983.
13. Wolferin K. Van The Enigma of Japanese Power, N.Y., 1990.
14. Emery S., Ellis W. Chlavatnatol Thailand: Comparative Innovation Strategies Bangkok, 2005.