Science, Technologies, Innovations №1(33) 2025, 53-64 р

http://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2025-1-06

Androshchuk H. O. — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Intellectual Property of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 11, K. Malevуch Str., building 4, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680; genandro1@gmail.com; +38 044 200-08-76; ORCID: 0000-0003-0781-9740

Rabotiahova L. I. — Leading Researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Intellectual Property of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 11, K. Malevуch Str., building 4, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680; +38 (044) 200-08-76, rli@ukr.net; ORCID 0000-0002-5450-1607

EU PATENT SYSTEM: UNITARY PATENT AND PATENT COURT (Part II)

Abstract. The article examines the organizational, and economic and legal aspects of the creation of a specialized Unified Patent Court (hereinafter referred to as the UPC), endowed with exclusive jurisdiction to hear all cases of infringement and invalidation of classical European patents and unitary patents (unitary patents) in the Unified Patent System of the EU, the functioning of which is regulated by the Unified Patent Court Agreement. The structural structure, competences, procedural and financial provisions that determine the activities of the UPC, institutional and procedural means of combating the abuse of patent rights, in particular, patent trolls, are analyzed. The activities of the UPC during 2024 are characterized. The claims filed with the UPC cover a wide range of technologies, with the information and communication technologies sector leading in terms of their number, followed by medical technologies and consumer goods. Although there are fewer cases in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, those that are considered are part of significant international disputes. Considering the decisions taken by the UPC in the consideration of patent disputes in its first year of operation, it is believed that the UPC has already established itself as an institution that makes reasoned or mainly reasoned decisions. The UPC Court of Appeal has clarified its position on many of the significant issues of substantive law that will be taken in the consideration of disputes.

Keywords: unified patent court, patent disputes, patent invalidity, classic European patent, patent rights abuse, patent trolls.

REFERENCES

  1. (2013). Agreement on a Unified Patent Court. Official Journal of the European Union. C 175/1, 1– Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2013_175_R_0001_01.
  2. (2015). Regulation (EU) №1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast). European Union. Document 32012R1215. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32012R1215.
  3. (2019). Patent litigation in Europe. An overview of national law and practice in the EPC contracting states, 5th edition. European Patent Office. Munich, 160 p. Retrieved from: https://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponot.nsf/0/05B84848CBCF7338C1257833003C2531/$FILE/patent_litigation_in_europe_2019_en.pdf.
  4. (2022). Set up of local and regional divisions of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court. Luxembourg, 4 p. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/ac_13_08072022_e_set_up_of_local_and_regi.pdf.
  5. Registry Presentation. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/en/registry/presentation.
  6. (2022). Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court. 140 p. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/rop_en_25_july_2022_final_consolidated_published_on_website.pdf.
  7. (2022). Table of Court Fees. Luxembourg, 8 p. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/ac_05_08072022_table_of_court_fees_en_final_for_publication_clean.pdf.
  8. Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the Unified Patent Court. 9 p. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/protocol-on-privileges-and-immunities.pdf.
  9. Unified Patent Court judicial appointments and Presidium elections. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/en/news/unified-patent-court-judicial-appointments-and-presidium-elections.
  10. Rules of procedure of the budget committee of the unified patent court. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/bc_02_23022022_rev_e.pdf.
  11. Rules of Procedure of the Advisory Committee of the Unified Patent Court. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/advc_02_24022022_e.pdf.
  12. Rules of Operation of the Mediation and Arbitration Centre. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/ac_06_08072022_rules_of_operation_mediation_arbitration_centre_en_final_for_publication.pdf.
  13. Training Centre. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/en/court/training-centre.
  14. Parties to proceedings and representation. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/en/faq/parties-proceedings-and-representation-mandate.
  15. (2022). Rules on the European Patent Litigation Certificate and other appropriate qualifications: Decision of the Administrative Committee of 22 February 2022, 10 p. Retrieved from: https://www.unified-patent-court.org/sites/default/files/upc_documents/ac_06_22022022_rev_e_0.pdf.
  16. (2007). Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Official Journal of the European Union, L. 339, 3–41. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/convention/2007/712/oj.
  17. (2004). Corrigendum to Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Official Journal of the European Union. L, 195/16. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32004L0048R%2801%29.
  18. Rantasaari, (2023). Patent litigation in Europe: intermediate fee shifting and the UPC. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 18 (9), 642–654. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/18/9/642/7222203.
  19. Strowel, A., & Léonard, A.(2020). Cutting Back Patent Over-Enforcement – How to Address Abusive Practices Within the EU Enforcement Framework. JIPITEC, 3 (1). Retrieved from: https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/269/264.
  20. Bisthoven, N. J. (2013). Patent trolls and abusive patent litigation in Europe: What the Unitary Patent Package can learn from the American experience? TTLF Working Papers. 19, 1– Retrieved from: http://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/janssens_wp19.pdf.
  21. Sautier, B. Patenttrolls: face à l’invasion des lutins, comment réagir? 89 p. Retrieved from: http://www.legalbiznext.com/droit/IMG/pdf/memoire_patent_trolls.pdf.
  22. Rantasaari, K. Abuse of Patent Enforcement in Europe. How Can Start-ups and Growth Companies Fight Back? Retrieved from: https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/291/284.
  23. Hibbert, J., & Mauny, C. (2024). The UPC in 2024: Statistics, Trends and Substantive Law. Retrieved from: https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/12/17/upc-2024-statistics-trends-substantive-law/id=183996/.