Science, Technologies, Innovations №4(20) 2021, 49-59 p

 PDF

http://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2021-4-05

Balanchuk I. S. — Senior Researcher of State Institution “Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information”, Antonovicha str., 180, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680; +38 (044) 521-09-81; balanchuk@uintei.kiev.ua;
ORCID: 0000-0002-5179-7350

Bessarab V. G. — Senior Researcher State Institution “Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information”, Antonovycha Str., 180, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680; +38 (044) 521-01-23; vbessar@ukr.net, ORCID: 0000-0003-1687-9278

DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF EXPERTS FOR THE SCIENTIFIC AND SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF PROJECTS. ANALYSIS OF WORLD EXPERIENCE

Abstract. Science, technology and innovation are categories of activities that increase their impact every year. These categories are interrelated, however, on the other hand, they are such that significantly differ from each other. Science promotes the development of innovative technologies as new knowledge that serves as a direct source of ideas for innovative technological opportunities; as a source of tools and methods for more efficient engineering design; as research equipment, laboratory and analytical methods used in research that ultimately find their application in design or manufacturing practice, often through intermediate disciplines; as a research practice — a source of development and assimilation of new human skills and abilities, which may ultimately be useful to technology; as a knowledge base that allows more effective use of strategies for applied research, development and improvement of new technologies. However, there is another way in which science acts as an engine for the development of innovation: as a knowledge base for assessing the feasibility of projects and analyzing technologies in terms of their broader social, economic and other types of benefits. This article is devoted to the study of the situation in the scientific, scientific and technical expertise of scientific projects. The basic concepts for conducting scientific, scientific and technical expertise were defined. The world experience in the selection of experts for scientific, scientific and technical expertise was analyzed. The key provisions and mandatory conditions were highlighted, in the presence of which the selection of experts for scientific, scientific and technical expertise will be successful. Recommendations regarding the settlement of the issue of selection of experts for scientific, scientific and technical expertise in Ukraine were given.

Keywords: experts, scientific, scientific and technical expertise, technology, innovation, criteria, com­mercialization, scientific research and development work.

REFERENCES

  1. Poliakova, H. (2018). Tekhnolohiia i modeli ekspertnoho otsiniuvannia yakosti naukovykh zdobutkiv na zasadakh kvalimetrychnoho pidkhodu [Technology and models of expert evaluation of the quality of scientific achievements on the basis of a qualimetric approach]. Pedahohichni nauky: teoriia, istoriia, innovatsiini tekhnolohii [Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovative technologies]. Retrieved from: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/pednauk_2018_9_11.pdf. [in Ukr.].
  2. Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (1998). Ekspertyza naukova i naukovo-tekhnichna. Yurydychna entsyklopediia [Scientific and scientific-technical examination. Legal encyclopedia]. Ukrainska entsyklopediia im. M. P. Bazhana [Ukrainian encyclopedia named after M. P. Bazhana], 2. 744 p. [in Ukr.].
  3. Divuieva, N. A. (2015). Analiz zarubizhnoho dosvidu orhanizatsii vidboru innovatsii na osnovi naukovo-tekhnichnoi ekspertyzy [Analysis of foreign experience in the organization of selection of innovations based on scientific and technical expertise]. Ekonomika i biznes [Economics and Business]. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-zarubezhnogo-opyta-organizatsii-otbora-innovatsiy-na-osnove-nauchno-tehnicheskoy-ekspertizy. [in Ukr.].
  4. Ivlev, I., Kneppo, P., Barták, M. (2015). Method for selecting expert groups and determining the importance of experts’ judgments for the purpose of managerial decision-making tasks in health system. Business Administration and Management. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277891133_Method_for_Selecting_Expert_Groups_and_Determining_the_Importance_of_Experts’_Judgments_for_the_Purpose_of_Managerial_Decision-Making_Tasks_in_Health_System. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-005
  5. About the project (2021). GoScience. Enhancing Comprehension. Retrieved from: https://www.goscience.eu/project_description.php.
  6. About AWT Watertreatment (2021). AWT Watertreatment. Retrieved from: https://awtwatertreatment.nl/en/about.
  7. Mission (2021). ANR agence nationale de la recherché. Retrieved from: https://anr.fr/en/anrs-role-in-research/missions/.
  8. German-Polish-Czech Science Platform (2021). Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Retrieved from: https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/en/home/home_node.html.
  9. Pro naukovu i naukovo-tekhnichnu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 10 lyut. 1995 r. № 51/95-VR [On scientific and scientific-technical examination: Law of Ukraine of February 10, 1995. No. 51/95-VR]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/51/95-вр#Text [in Ukr.].
  10. Korovina, I. V., Konstantinova, D. V., Safonkina, O. S. (2019). Ispolzovanie metoda «Peer Review» dlya kontrolya i otsenki yazyikovyih znaniy [Using the “Peer Review” method for monitoring and assessing linguistic knowledge]. Yazyikoznanie i literaturovedenie [Linguistics and Literary Studies]. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ispolzovanie-metoda-peer-review-dlya-kontrolya-i-otsenki-yazykovyh-znaniy [in Russ.].
  11. Accueil (2021). Haut Conseil de la Science et de la Technologie. Retrieved from: http://www.hcst.fr/.
  12. Close-up (2021). The European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education (EQAR). Retrieved from: https://www.eqar.eu/about/close-up/.
  13. Profile (2021). Swiss National Science Foundation. Retrieved from: https://www.snf.ch/en/GrjwOKMdGiigVhgY/page/theSNSF/profile.
  14. About the National Science Foundation (2021). The National Science Foundation (NSF). Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/about/.
  15. Nauchno-tehnicheskaya i tehnologicheskaya ekspertiza proektov [Scientific, technical and technological expertise of projects] (2016). RVK. Retrieved from: https://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/f44/RVC_project_expertise.pdf [in Russ.].