Science, Technologies, Innovations №3(31) 2024, 15-26 р

http://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2024-3-02

Orkhan Sadig Shukurov — Director, Business Partners Consulting LLC, Postgraduate Student of The department of Business and logistics, Azerbaijan State Economic University, 8, Fakhraddin Asadov Str., Narimanov district, Baku, Azerbajian; +994502026119; orxan@inbox.ru; ORCID: 0009-0006-3680-7676

THE IMPACT OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND TECHNOLOGY IN BUSINESS ON THE INNOVATION ECONOMY

Abstract. Against the backdrop of economic transformations, Azerbaijan is trying to improve its competitiveness in the world. Innovations are becoming a key element of this process, and investments in education and training strengthen the basis for further changes. From this point of view, the item “The situation of the influence of business system development on national innovation activity in Azerbaijan requires strengthening the coordinated actions of both the state and the private sector in attracting investment, human capital and technological resources” in the research work. To confirm this position, we set ourselves the task of analyzing both theoretical approaches and the real situation in this area in Azerbaijan. Taking them into account, they were taken as quantitative and qualitative factors and analyzed on the basis of a fuzzy model using the MATLAB software package, and the methods of statistical comparative analysis and grouping were also used. The theoretical significance of the study lies in expanding the scientific approach to the issue of the influence of human capital, and technology on the formation of an innovative economy in the business system. The practical significance lies in the fact that the proposed results of innovative activity can be important in building an innovative economy in Azerbaijan and in studying the problems of increasing competitiveness.

Keywords: innovation, human capital, technology, national economy, education, sustainable development.

REFERENCES

  1. Atakishiyev, M., & Suleymanov, G. (2004). Innovation management. Baku, S. 8.
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. XVII (1), 99–120.
  3. Bronwyn, H. Hall, & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. 1st Edition, 1 – March 25.
  4. Freeman, Ch. (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19, 5–24.
  5. Clarence, W. de Silva (1995). Intelligent Control: Fuzzy Logic Applications, 360 p. Retrieved from: https://www.routledge.com/Intelligent-Control-Fuzzy-Logic-Applications/deSilva/p/book/9780849379826?srsltid=AfmBOorgeHbvMQKJmqSEpERDIww7xpmYAFBwGaWNu231xXhflkLSrijW.
  6. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Includes bibliographical references and index. Retrieved from:  https://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/books/DI/DemocInn.pdf.
  7. Imanov, K. D. (2003). Fuzzy models for assessing the sustainable development of Azerbaijan. Baku, S. 39.
  8. Etzkowitz, G.; Uvarova A. F. (Translation from English) (2010). Triple spiral. Universitets – enterprises – state. Innovations in action. Tomsk. [in Russ.].
  9. Korneev, V. V. et al. (2001). Database. Intelligent information processing. Decision making in vague conditions. Moscow, P. 255–290. [in Russ.].
  10. Leonenkov, A. (2003). Fuzzy modeling in MATLAB and fuzzy TECH. St. Petersburg, P. 73. [in Russ.].
  11. Leydesdorff, L, & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix of Innovation. Issue of Science and Public Policy. 25 (6).
  12. Hudec, M. (2016). Fuzziness in Information Systems.
  13. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. Part 2: The Problem of Development: A Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems. 98 (5), S71–S102.
  14. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan, London.
  15. Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2004). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 22 (4), 483–498.
  16. Bělohlávek, R., & Joseph, W. (2017). Dauben & George J. Clear: Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics: A Historical Perspective.
  17. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3), 312–320. Retrieved from:  http://www.jstor.org/stable/1926047.
  18. Shafizade, E. R., & Shikhlinskaya, R. Yu. (2010). Application of fuzzy inference rules to a model for optimizing the production and sectoral structure of agriculture to ensure food security. Actual Problems of Economics. 1 (103), 286–294.
  19. Stepanova, E. Yu. (2013). Innovative development of multi-level companies: status, problems, trends and prospects, Innovative development of the economy: Trends and prospects. Proceedings of the II international scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “Perm National Research Polytechnic University”. Perm, October 15, p.186 [in Russ.].
  20. (2020). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from:  https://www.weforum.org/publications.
  21. Zadeh, L. (1976). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to making approximate decisions. Moscow, 68 p. [in Russ.].
  22. Startaplar. Retrieved from:  https://www.startup.az/startup.html.