Science, Technologies, Innovations №3(27) 2023, 22-29 p

 PDF

http://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2023-3-03

Ihnatsevych S. P. — PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher of State Scientific Institution “Ukrainian Institute for Scientific Technical Expertise and Information”, 180, Antonovycha Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; ignatsevichserg@ukrintei.ua;
ORCID: 0000-0002-0401-4325

STATE AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITY IN THE FIELD OF CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION

Abstract. Cross-border cooperation is one of the key elements of economic development in border areas. While governments encourage the development of cross-border cooperation by minimizing the impact of borders on economic processes, in practice, there is no direct connection between the level of border “openness” and the activation of scientific and technical activity in border regions. The nature of this connection is considerably more complex, which is the focus of this article. The article examines the factors influencing the development of cross-border cooperation in general, and scientific and technical activity in particular. It also explores the dimensions of innovation systems in the field of cross-border cooperation. In conclusion, it outlines the prospects for the further development of scientific and technical activity in border areas, taking into account the influence of borders on the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation.

Keywords: cross-border cooperation, scientific and technical activity, borders, innovative development, technology transfer, foreign experience.

REFERENCES

  1. Jaansoo, A. (2016). Public Administration Reform, Crossborder Cooperation and Europeanisation in CEE Countries. Europeanisation in Public Administration Reforms: Selected Revised Papers from the 23rd NISPAcee Annual Conference (May 21–23, 2015, Tbilisi, Georgia). Bratislava, P. 37–49. Retrieved from: https://www.nispa.org/files/EPARbookEN.pdf.
  2. Saaida, M., & Qawasmi, M. (2023). The challenges of public administration in managing cross-border cooperation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 10, 49–56. Retrieved from: https://www.allsubjectjournal.com/assets/archives/2023/vol10issue4/10070-1682331420784.pdf.
  3. Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2019). Exploring cross-border integration in Europe: How do populations cross borders and perceive their neighbours? European Urban and Regional Studies. 26 (2), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418756934.
  4. Hornostai, N. I., & Mykhalchenkova, O. Y. (2023). Stan ta osoblyvosti rozvytku transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva v Ukraini [Status and peculiarities of cross-border cooperation development in Ukraine]. Nauka, Tekhnolohii, Innovatsii [Science, Technologies, Innovations]. 2 (26), 20–25. http://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2023-2-03 [in Ukr.].
  5. Cappellano, F., Sohn, C., Makkonen, T., & Kaisto, V. (2022). Bringing borders back into cross-border regional innovation systems: Functions and dynamics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 54 (5), 1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221073987.
  6. Niebuhr, A., & Stiller, S. (2004). Integration effects in border regions: A survey of economic theory and empirical studies. Review of Regional Research. 24, 3–21. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23730420_Integration_effects_in_border_regions_-A_survey_of_economic_theory_and_empirical_studies.
  7. Koschatzky, K. (2000). A River Is a River: Cross-Border Networking between Baden and Alsace. European Planning Studies. 8, 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666422.
  8. Van Rijnsoever, F., & Hessels, L. (2011). Factors Associated with Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration. Research Policy. 40, 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001.
  9. Nitsch, V., & С Wolf, N. (2013). Tear down this wall: On the persistence of borders in trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique. 46 (1), 154–179. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42705867. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12002.
  10. Ihnatsevych, S. P., & Balanchuk, I. S. (2023). Naukovo-tekhnichna diialnist u sferi transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva: yevropeiskyi dosvid [Scientific and technical activities in the sphere of transborder cooperation: european experience]. Nauka, Tekhnolohii, Innovatsii [Science, Technologies, Innovations]. 1 (25), 8–14. http://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2023-1-02 [in Ukr.].
  11. Makkonen, T,. Weidenfeld, A., & Williams, A. (2017). Cross‐Border Regional Innovation System Integration. An Analytical Framework. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 108, 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12223.
  12. Lundquist, K-J., & Trippl, M. (2013). Distance, Proximity and Types of Cross-Border Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis. Regional Studies. 47, 450–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.560933.
  13. Maggioni, M., & Uberti, E.; Frenken, K. (Ed.) (2007). Inter-Regional Knowledge Flows in Europe. Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography. P. 230–255. Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847205391.00023.
  14. Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2009). Knowledge Flows across European Regions. Annals of Regional Science. 43, 669–690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0256-5.
  15. Frenken, K., van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies. 41, 685–697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296.